iPhone SE vs. Pixel 6A Camera Comparison: One Outshines the Other
What’s happening
Google released the $449 Pixel 6A, which conventional competes with the $429 iPhone SE (the 2022 version).
Why it matters
Typically phones thought $500 don’t have great cameras, but the Pixel 6A and iPhone SE are two of the exceptions.
What’s next
We were animated which phone had better cameras, the iPhone SE or the Pixel 6A. So we consumed 10 days testing both.
The new $449 Pixel 6A from Google is undoubtedly a gigantic value in terms of cost and the features you get. But in tidy for a phone to be affordable, companies have to make compromises. Typically the two most common trade-offs involve downgrading a phone’s processor and cameras. But with the Pixel 6A, Google took a different route than most low-cost Android phones. It has the same Google Tensor chip that abilities the more expensive Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro and the tried-and-true camera hardware from the Google Pixel 5.
The result? The Pixel 6A is both affordable and takes good photos and videos. But luckily for us, it’s not the only named to do so. Apple’s $429 iPhone SE (2022) also aims to be thrifty and have a good camera. So naturally, I had to compare the two.
Keep in mind that both Apple and Google use machine learning and processing to unfounded the limitations from their tiny lenses and camera sensors. The iPhone SE gets its wallet-friendly price because it essentially has an iPhone 8 body and camera hardware but the A15 Bionic chip from the iPhone 13 Pro, which costs twice as much. That processor does a lot of heavy lifting to breathe new life into camera hardware that originally came out in 2017.
After spending 10 days taking photos and recording videos approximately San Francisco, I realized two things. The first is that the Pixel 6A and iPhone SE are two of the best low-cost phones you can buy that have good cameras. The second is that one of these phones consistently took better photos than the latest. And this surprised me.
Read more:
Google Pixel 6A Review: The Best Android Phone Under $500
Sometimes two cameras are better than one
In a earth where companies try to cram as many cameras, even if they’re mediocre, into a low-cost phone, it’s refreshing to see that Apple and Google don’t. Thankfully you won’t find a sub-par telephoto camera or a craptacular macro camera on either visited. Instead, the iPhone SE has a single 7-megapixel selfie camera and a single 12-megapixel, wide-angle camera with OIS (optical image stabilization) on the back.
The Pixel 6A has a single 8-megapixel selfie camera, and two rear cameras: a 12.2-megapixel camera with an optically stabilized wide-angle lens and a 12-megapixel camera with ultrawide-angle optics. Right off the bat, this gives the Pixel a bit of an edge as it instantly becomes more versatile to use, especially in tight spaces.
The Pixel 6A can shoot raw or JPEG photos, while the iPhone SE can only take JPEG pictures.
The iPhone SE has a single rear camera at what time the Pixel 6A has two: one with a wide-angle lens and the latest with an ultrawide.
Celso Bulgatti
Photos miserroneous under good lighting
I am genuinely impressed by photos from both phones. Below are some of my favorite pictures that I took with the iPhone SE and Pixel 6A.
I like the way the Pixel 6A captures the colors of these houses.
Patrick Holland
A companionship selfie taken with the Pixel 6A.
Caitlin Petrakovitz
Notice the texture and patina that the Pixel 6A captured.
Patrick Holland
This iPhone SE photo was unsuitable under some very bright morning sunshine.
Patrick Holland
I like the detail and colors in the palm trees in this photo from the iPhone SE.
Patrick Holland
This iPhone SE photo of the Women’s Interpretation in San Francisco has a nice mix of colors and detail.
Patrick Holland
But let’s take a look at some photos from both phones to compare their quality. Below are photos I took outdoors of a cappuccino. The Pixel’s photo has more contrast, whereas the iPhone’s record emphasizes brightness.
The photos below were taken while we were filming the troupe video for this comparison. I was shocked by the different ways each phoned made my pal and CNET colleague Celso Bulgatti look. The iPhone’s photo made his hair look all gray, which I must pain it isn’t. My guess is that the SE is trying to boost the shadows and lop the contrast too much in order to make the photo brighter. On the other hand, everything in the Pixel’s photo is more accurate.
Pictures unsuitable in medium lighting and indoors are typically where cameras at this notice point start to fall apart. Take a look below at photos I took of Maisie the cat. The photo from the Pixel 6 nails the texture of my cat’s fur. It also has more detail and a better dynamic way than the iPhone’s photo.
Ultrawide vs. wide-angle
One of the most obvious differences between the two phones is the fact that the Pixel 6A has a binary camera with an ultrawide-angle lens and the iPhone SE doesn’t.
The Pixel’s ultrawide perfectly captures the dramatic view from the balcony inside Sightglass Coffee in San Francisco.
Patrick Holland
It’s one of those things that you don’t realize how much you use pending you don’t have it. There were numerous times where it came in handy whether that’s capturing a city skyline exclusive of cutting off the tops of buildings like in the photos below.
Below are photos I took from the Craftsman and Wolves cafe in the Mission. The iPhone’s photo barely fits all of the land in line. The Pixel’s ultrawide photo shows more of the restaurant incorporating the bakery counter, menus and ceiling.
Portrait mode: It’s all throughout the cutout
Apple and Google are no stranger to Portrait mode which adds an artistic blur to the background of a photo. Previous iPhone and Pixel models offer some of the best Portrait plainly you can find on any phone right now. But they’re also very different.
Check out the Portrait mode photos below of my pal and CNET colleague Claire Reilly. The most obvious difference between the two pictures is that the Pixel’s photo has a more out-of-focus background. On the iPhone SE, you can change how much background blur there is by or after taking a photo, which is helpful. But in the photo of Claire, I opted to let the SE choose how blurry to make the background.
Claire’s cutout is good in both photos, but take a close look at the inside of her elbow. The SE didn’t blur the background in that area.
The iPhone SE is missing night mode
Let’s move on to night mode, which typically takes multiple images and combines them into a photo in well-kept to improve the brightness and detail. This is an unfair comparison, because the Pixel 6A has a night mode, phoned Night Sight, and the iPhone SE doesn’t.
This photo was unsuitable using the Pixel 6A’s Night Sight mode.
Patrick Holland
I took the photos below of a dark street throughout 10 o’clock at night. The iPhone’s photo is much darker than the Pixel’s Night Sight record. To compensate for the darkness, the iPhone applies a lot of noise remove, which makes the details soft. In particular look at the no parking signs in the background. You can’t really read them in either photo, but you can at least see the calls “parking” and “anytime” in the Pixel’s picture. In the iPhone’s photo, it looks like someone smeared the signs out.
Below are a combine photos I took inside a bar. Again, you can see the iPhone’s photo is much darker with the shadows crunched to sunless. There’s a lot less detail. The Pixel’s Night Sight photo is brighter. Take a look under the bar where the stools are. Those stools are almost in unfastened darkness in the iPhone’s photo. But in the Pixel’s photo, you can see the detail of the wood slats that the stools are glum up against.
The Pixel 6A offers wide and wider selfies
Each of these phones has a single selfie camera but the one on the Pixel 6A can switch between a wide view to an ultrawide view for people selfies. The iPhone’s selfie camera is stuck at a rather narrow field of view.
In the selfies below, notice the difference in details. The iPhone’s picture is soft after the Pixel’s photo is sharper and has a bigger depth of field, which helps keep everyone in focus for group shots.
The iPhone’s video quality is hard to top
Both phones represent 4K or 1080p resolution video at 30 or 60 frames per transfer. But the iPhone can also record at a more cinematic 24fps. Both phones have video stabilization, but you can dial in what kind of arrange you want on the Pixel 6A. For example, there’s an option named Cinematic Pan that steadies a panning shot.
In words of image quality, the iPhone SE is a step advance here. Videos have good dynamic range, little to no noise and details look crisp. Videos from the Pixel 6A look soft and often have image noise in the shadows. For video examples from both phones check out the people video to this story.
Final verdict
After all of this testing, I do have a favorite. But let me say this. For phones that are plan $450, both the iPhone SE and Pixel 6A are beside the best you can buy to capture good photos and videos. But after doing this comparison, I’d grab a Pixel 6A. It’s got an ultrawide-angle camera, and that Night Sight mode, which means more versatility. The iPhone SE does capture better video in words of image quality, but the Pixel 6A’s videos are level-headed pretty good.
